<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OJ and double jeopardy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2006/11/oj-and-double-jeopardy-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2006/11/oj-and-double-jeopardy-2/</link>
	<description>Two lawyers on law, legislation and liberty. And other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: O.J.&#8217;s ill gotten-gains &#171; The Legal Soapbox</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2006/11/oj-and-double-jeopardy-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9969</link>
		<dc:creator>O.J.&#8217;s ill gotten-gains &#171; The Legal Soapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2006/11/24/oj-and-double-jeopardy-2/#comment-9969</guid>
		<description>[...] ill&#160;gotten-gains  Jump to Comments I&#8217;ve posted before about O.J. Simpson&#8217;s book, If I Did It, and the resulting furore. In fact, in my previous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ill&nbsp;gotten-gains  Jump to Comments I&#8217;ve posted before about O.J. Simpson&#8217;s book, If I Did It, and the resulting furore. In fact, in my previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iain</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2006/11/oj-and-double-jeopardy-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9968</link>
		<dc:creator>iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2006/11/24/oj-and-double-jeopardy-2/#comment-9968</guid>
		<description>I wonder if another publisher will pick up the book?&lt;br /&gt; Double Jeopardy does give some one protection against a never ending series of court cases but there are times, it seems, when compelling new evidence comes up that another prosecution can be justified but the question is should we change what has been a successful concept for those few cases? A tough one for which I have no answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if another publisher will pick up the book?<br /> Double Jeopardy does give some one protection against a never ending series of court cases but there are times, it seems, when compelling new evidence comes up that another prosecution can be justified but the question is should we change what has been a successful concept for those few cases? A tough one for which I have no answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
