<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Potter Schmotter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/</link>
	<description>Two lawyers on law, legislation and liberty. And other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry Potter and JK Rowling &#171; Searching for Crabshells</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10376</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Potter and JK Rowling &#171; Searching for Crabshells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10376</guid>
		<description>[...] Links: [1] boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2003/09/24/dumbing_down_american_readers [2] A.S. Byatt, ‘Harry Potter and the Childish Adult’, New York Times, 7 July 2003 (subscription needed) through ‘The Legal Soapbox’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Links: [1] boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2003/09/24/dumbing_down_american_readers [2] A.S. Byatt, ‘Harry Potter and the Childish Adult’, New York Times, 7 July 2003 (subscription needed) through ‘The Legal Soapbox’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nandita</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10377</link>
		<dc:creator>nandita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10377</guid>
		<description>I was so pleased to read this post. I love the 'The Weirdstone of Brisengamen' and read Lloyd Alexander's series more times over than I could keep count of. Harry Potter tends to annoy me but until I read your post, I wasn't quite sure why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was so pleased to read this post. I love the &#8216;The Weirdstone of Brisengamen&#8217; and read Lloyd Alexander&#8217;s series more times over than I could keep count of. Harry Potter tends to annoy me but until I read your post, I wasn&#8217;t quite sure why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not so much gibberish as derivative and boring &#171; The Legal Soapbox</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10378</link>
		<dc:creator>Not so much gibberish as derivative and boring &#171; The Legal Soapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10378</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve explained in a previous post, I don&#8217;t think the plot lines are gibberish, but I find the series rather derivative, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve explained in a previous post, I don&#8217;t think the plot lines are gibberish, but I find the series rather derivative, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10375</link>
		<dc:creator>-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10375</guid>
		<description>LOTR is much better than Harry Potter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOTR is much better than Harry Potter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10374</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10374</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that Harry Potter is not always the best written example of its kind and because of the marketing blitz has become something of a juggernaut, suffering from a lack of editing (Book 5 was far too long), and obviously Rowling could learn a lot about convincing malevolent evil from Susan Cooper who remains one of my most compelling childhood memories!  Nevertheless, I remember why I liked them in the first place - apart from the characters (who are entertaining) and the plot (which, although formulaic, keeps ratcheting forward and raising the stakes).  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The most interesting part was the way that Harry's initiation into this magical society was, for me, a metaphor for growing up; and because the world was all strange and new for us too, it was a reminder of what that had been like.  At first the magic world was wonderful and everything exciting, an escape from his dreary and disappointing (and abusive) real-world existence, but slowly Harry (and we) discovered that this world wasn't perfect either, that it had not just the odd person who was mean, but the system itself was fundamentally flawed and the 'adults' were capable of deluding themselves into justifying their bad choices, and even the good guys weren't always able to save the day.  I found that arc interesting.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Of course it has to be more than one point to remain worth reading over a 7-book series, and I certainly hope Rowling has found (or is listening to!) an editor to finish the series off well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that Harry Potter is not always the best written example of its kind and because of the marketing blitz has become something of a juggernaut, suffering from a lack of editing (Book 5 was far too long), and obviously Rowling could learn a lot about convincing malevolent evil from Susan Cooper who remains one of my most compelling childhood memories!  Nevertheless, I remember why I liked them in the first place - apart from the characters (who are entertaining) and the plot (which, although formulaic, keeps ratcheting forward and raising the stakes).  </p>
<p>The most interesting part was the way that Harry&#8217;s initiation into this magical society was, for me, a metaphor for growing up; and because the world was all strange and new for us too, it was a reminder of what that had been like.  At first the magic world was wonderful and everything exciting, an escape from his dreary and disappointing (and abusive) real-world existence, but slowly Harry (and we) discovered that this world wasn&#8217;t perfect either, that it had not just the odd person who was mean, but the system itself was fundamentally flawed and the &#8216;adults&#8217; were capable of deluding themselves into justifying their bad choices, and even the good guys weren&#8217;t always able to save the day.  I found that arc interesting.</p>
<p>Of course it has to be more than one point to remain worth reading over a 7-book series, and I certainly hope Rowling has found (or is listening to!) an editor to finish the series off well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Litlove</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10373</link>
		<dc:creator>Litlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10373</guid>
		<description>I agree with you about that head in formaldehyde. It's not the kind of art that I like either - I want space to think about a work of art, rather than be confronted with a blatant statement.  The list of children's books is very interesting too, and something I'll return to consult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you about that head in formaldehyde. It&#8217;s not the kind of art that I like either - I want space to think about a work of art, rather than be confronted with a blatant statement.  The list of children&#8217;s books is very interesting too, and something I&#8217;ll return to consult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/04/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10372</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/potter-schmotter-2/#comment-10372</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And what makes a book "well-written"?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Lactantius had been able to bring nothing with him save his own manuscripts and was thus left, with all his unrivalled powers of expression, rather vague about what to express; with, more than that, the ever-present fear of falling into error.  He delighted in writing, in the joinery and embellishment of his sentences, in the consciousness of high rare virtue when every word had been used in its purest and most precise sense, in the kitten games of syntax and rhetoric.  Words could do anything except generate their own meaning.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Evelyn Waugh, &lt;i&gt;Helena&lt;/i&gt;, chapter 6, Penguin edition (1963), p. 79.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And what makes a book &#8220;well-written&#8221;?</i></p>
<p>Lactantius had been able to bring nothing with him save his own manuscripts and was thus left, with all his unrivalled powers of expression, rather vague about what to express; with, more than that, the ever-present fear of falling into error.  He delighted in writing, in the joinery and embellishment of his sentences, in the consciousness of high rare virtue when every word had been used in its purest and most precise sense, in the kitten games of syntax and rhetoric.  Words could do anything except generate their own meaning.</p>
<p>Evelyn Waugh, <i>Helena</i>, chapter 6, Penguin edition (1963), p. 79.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
