<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attack of the clones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/attack-of-the-clones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/attack-of-the-clones/</link>
	<description>Two lawyers on law, legislation and liberty. And other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer &#187; Poor old Keith Mason</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-12616</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer &#187; Poor old Keith Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-12616</guid>
		<description>[...] I also think that Farah is a bad and intemperate judgment (as described here). My understanding is that many State Court judges have interpreted it as a &#8220;slap in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I also think that Farah is a bad and intemperate judgment (as described here). My understanding is that many State Court judges have interpreted it as a &#8220;slap in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer &#187; Nature abhors a vacuum&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-12565</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer &#187; Nature abhors a vacuum&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsoapbox.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-12565</guid>
		<description>[...] year, as I have described in this post, the High Court put the boot into restitution law very thoroughly in Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year, as I have described in this post, the High Court put the boot into restitution law very thoroughly in Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
