<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: L&#8217;Orfeo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/</link>
	<description>Two lawyers on law, legislation and liberty. And other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7842</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7842</guid>
		<description>sl, you might enjoy Handel (still baroque).  His dramatic oratorio Solomon and his masque Acis and Galatea are both fabulous -- lovely tunes, great orchestration and just a bit more fun than Monteverdi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sl, you might enjoy Handel (still baroque).  His dramatic oratorio Solomon and his masque Acis and Galatea are both fabulous &#8212; lovely tunes, great orchestration and just a bit more fun than Monteverdi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7841</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7841</guid>
		<description>I think I'll stick to baroque for a while, if only for the restraint ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ll stick to baroque for a while, if only for the restraint <img src='http://skepticlawyer.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7840</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7840</guid>
		<description>I may have it the wrong way round, TimT. It's an apocryphal story, anyway. Wagner is sublime at his best but, golly, you have to wade through a lot of dross to get to the gems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may have it the wrong way round, TimT. It&#8217;s an apocryphal story, anyway. Wagner is sublime at his best but, golly, you have to wade through a lot of dross to get to the gems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimT</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7839</link>
		<dc:creator>TimT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7839</guid>
		<description>I find it doubtful that Shaw rated G&#38;S higher than Wagner. He wrote a hilarious little book of Wagner criticism/appreciation that, in effect, introduced Wagner to the English speaking world: he rated him very highly indeed.

Maybe it was one of his quips or paradoxes?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it doubtful that Shaw rated G&amp;S higher than Wagner. He wrote a hilarious little book of Wagner criticism/appreciation that, in effect, introduced Wagner to the English speaking world: he rated him very highly indeed.</p>
<p>Maybe it was one of his quips or paradoxes?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7838</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7838</guid>
		<description>On a related issue, one of the things I noticed when I was reading Barzun's &lt;i&gt;Dawn to Decadence&lt;/i&gt; was how highly he rated Shaw. I'd always thought Shaw amusing but also the sort of playwright who whipped up a play in order to harangue everyone in a (usually rather long) preface.

Barzun made me appreciate just how wittily written Shaw's prefaces are, and also helped me to respect his critical judgments (Shaw was a superb and prolific reviewer). If he rated G&#38;S so highly, he was likely to be right in an absolute sense. He really did understand comedy and the comic spirit.

Just on quality, it's now got to the point that &lt;i&gt;L'Orfeo&lt;/i&gt; is a complete sellout and the Edinburgh Festival organisers are warning punters about ticket touts. I figure an opera must be pretty damned good when the ticket touts start to emerge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a related issue, one of the things I noticed when I was reading Barzun&#8217;s <i>Dawn to Decadence</i> was how highly he rated Shaw. I&#8217;d always thought Shaw amusing but also the sort of playwright who whipped up a play in order to harangue everyone in a (usually rather long) preface.</p>
<p>Barzun made me appreciate just how wittily written Shaw&#8217;s prefaces are, and also helped me to respect his critical judgments (Shaw was a superb and prolific reviewer). If he rated G&amp;S so highly, he was likely to be right in an absolute sense. He really did understand comedy and the comic spirit.</p>
<p>Just on quality, it&#8217;s now got to the point that <i>L&#8217;Orfeo</i> is a complete sellout and the Edinburgh Festival organisers are warning punters about ticket touts. I figure an opera must be pretty damned good when the ticket touts start to emerge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7837</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7837</guid>
		<description>Glad you liked L'Orfeo, sl. It's a wonderful work. I recommend Purcell (The Fairy Queen, Dido and Aeneas) if the baroque style appealed to you.

I'm an opera buff but I dislike the implication of 'opera' that somehow it's all the same, or if you like some of the genre you have to like all of it.  How like is Janacek to Britten?  Not very!

I dislike Italian opera (unusual for a fan) with the exception of two or three of Puccini's works. Verdi I love to watch for the spectacle, but the usual 'DUM dum dum, DUM dum dum' intro to his arias makes me tired -- as do many of the arias.

The greatest operas are by Mozart -- I don't think it would be physically possible not to enjoy a good performance of The Marriage of Figaro.  That said, poor performances can be an incredible turn-off.  My wife and I took our 23 year old niece to a performance of Figaro by Opera Australia hoping to convert her. It was a shocker and probably put the poor girl off opera for at least a decade.

But by the same token the performance we watched last year in Vienna of Bizet's Carmen I swear would have converted the most determined sceptic.

Opera is easy to get wrong and difficult to get right.  But when it works there's just nothing like it.

Agree with others on G&#38;S. It's almost the perfect match of words, wit and music.  George Bernard Shaw rated it even higher than Wagner, I seem to recall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you liked L&#8217;Orfeo, sl. It&#8217;s a wonderful work. I recommend Purcell (The Fairy Queen, Dido and Aeneas) if the baroque style appealed to you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an opera buff but I dislike the implication of &#8216;opera&#8217; that somehow it&#8217;s all the same, or if you like some of the genre you have to like all of it.  How like is Janacek to Britten?  Not very!</p>
<p>I dislike Italian opera (unusual for a fan) with the exception of two or three of Puccini&#8217;s works. Verdi I love to watch for the spectacle, but the usual &#8216;DUM dum dum, DUM dum dum&#8217; intro to his arias makes me tired &#8212; as do many of the arias.</p>
<p>The greatest operas are by Mozart &#8212; I don&#8217;t think it would be physically possible not to enjoy a good performance of The Marriage of Figaro.  That said, poor performances can be an incredible turn-off.  My wife and I took our 23 year old niece to a performance of Figaro by Opera Australia hoping to convert her. It was a shocker and probably put the poor girl off opera for at least a decade.</p>
<p>But by the same token the performance we watched last year in Vienna of Bizet&#8217;s Carmen I swear would have converted the most determined sceptic.</p>
<p>Opera is easy to get wrong and difficult to get right.  But when it works there&#8217;s just nothing like it.</p>
<p>Agree with others on G&amp;S. It&#8217;s almost the perfect match of words, wit and music.  George Bernard Shaw rated it even higher than Wagner, I seem to recall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimT</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7836</link>
		<dc:creator>TimT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7836</guid>
		<description>I greatly prefer the lyrics to the music of G&#38;S operettas, though perhaps I'm a bit pretentious about that. They're certainly far superior to some modern musicals (which I won't name.)

Was it Orwell that said of late 19th century poets and lyricists like Gilbert that they mastered comic poetry, turning it into an extremely complicated and technical art. This might be true, though it's also true that details of Gilbert's poetry can be endlessly changed and rearranged to suit modern times - it's as if it's important to maintain the &lt;i&gt;form&lt;/i&gt; of the poetry, while the message can be manipulated to suit the poet.

'I am the very model of a modern major general' has a claim to being the most rewritten song in existence. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major-General's_Song#In_popular_culture" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wikipedia lists some of these parodies.&lt;/a&gt; There are many more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I greatly prefer the lyrics to the music of G&amp;S operettas, though perhaps I&#8217;m a bit pretentious about that. They&#8217;re certainly far superior to some modern musicals (which I won&#8217;t name.)</p>
<p>Was it Orwell that said of late 19th century poets and lyricists like Gilbert that they mastered comic poetry, turning it into an extremely complicated and technical art. This might be true, though it&#8217;s also true that details of Gilbert&#8217;s poetry can be endlessly changed and rearranged to suit modern times - it&#8217;s as if it&#8217;s important to maintain the <i>form</i> of the poetry, while the message can be manipulated to suit the poet.</p>
<p>&#8216;I am the very model of a modern major general&#8217; has a claim to being the most rewritten song in existence. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major-General's_Song#In_popular_culture" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia lists some of these parodies.</a> There are many more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7835</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7835</guid>
		<description>I used to get a kick out of rewriting G&#38;S lyrics so that they took the piss out of more modern stuff/people. It's quite easy to do, to the point where I suspect they were written with easy substitution in mind.

Just on FDB's point - I wonder if I believed &lt;em&gt;L'Orfeo&lt;/em&gt; because it was about a singer. It wasn't such a stretch to turn the whole exercise into song. I must admit the starving Bohemians plot with fat people playing the parts (up the thread) sounds like a pretty big stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to get a kick out of rewriting G&amp;S lyrics so that they took the piss out of more modern stuff/people. It&#8217;s quite easy to do, to the point where I suspect they were written with easy substitution in mind.</p>
<p>Just on FDB&#8217;s point - I wonder if I believed <em>L&#8217;Orfeo</em> because it was about a singer. It wasn&#8217;t such a stretch to turn the whole exercise into song. I must admit the starving Bohemians plot with fat people playing the parts (up the thread) sounds like a pretty big stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleyonhjelm</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7834</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleyonhjelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7834</guid>
		<description>Appreciating opera is a little bit like learning another language. Once you get past the incomprehensible stage, it starts to make sense. The more you persevere, the better it sounds.

As with any art form, not all opera is good. But the best opera, in my opinion, is better than practically anything. JC is right about Puccini - Turandot can still give me goose bumps after hearing and watching it innumerable times.

As for fat ladies, they tend to come with the great voices. But it's not all a turn-off. In Salome, for example, the star flashes her map of Tasmania in the dance of the seven veils. (It wasn't until then that my wife understood why I take the binoculars.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciating opera is a little bit like learning another language. Once you get past the incomprehensible stage, it starts to make sense. The more you persevere, the better it sounds.</p>
<p>As with any art form, not all opera is good. But the best opera, in my opinion, is better than practically anything. JC is right about Puccini - Turandot can still give me goose bumps after hearing and watching it innumerable times.</p>
<p>As for fat ladies, they tend to come with the great voices. But it&#8217;s not all a turn-off. In Salome, for example, the star flashes her map of Tasmania in the dance of the seven veils. (It wasn&#8217;t until then that my wife understood why I take the binoculars.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe Champion</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2007/08/lorfeo/#comment-7833</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3064#comment-7833</guid>
		<description>I don't suppose Gilbert and Sullivan counts as opera but the lyrics are a lot of satirical fun and the tunes roll along. Snobs turn up their noses at G&#38;S and I suppose young people do as well.

There was a Simpsons episode where Bart held the murderous Sideshow Bob at bay while he did a rendition of Pinafore? that went on long enough for the police to intervene and save him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t suppose Gilbert and Sullivan counts as opera but the lyrics are a lot of satirical fun and the tunes roll along. Snobs turn up their noses at G&amp;S and I suppose young people do as well.</p>
<p>There was a Simpsons episode where Bart held the murderous Sideshow Bob at bay while he did a rendition of Pinafore? that went on long enough for the police to intervene and save him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
