<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4th Test heroics (we hope)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/</link>
	<description>Two lawyers on law, legislation and liberty. And other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9346</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9346</guid>
		<description>And I'll hand out manners lectures to who I like, when I like, on my threads. Go start your own blog if you've got a problem with it.

I thought there'd been some rapprochement, but obviously not. Sigh. I am now going to kill this thread (so sorry other cricket fans - you will have to go over to Tony's place).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;ll hand out manners lectures to who I like, when I like, on my threads. Go start your own blog if you&#8217;ve got a problem with it.</p>
<p>I thought there&#8217;d been some rapprochement, but obviously not. Sigh. I am now going to kill this thread (so sorry other cricket fans - you will have to go over to Tony&#8217;s place).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9345</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9345</guid>
		<description>Michael, you know everyone. We'll just defer to your absolute knowledge, oh mighty one. Now maybe you can tell us all why the &lt;i&gt;Bulletin&lt;/i&gt; folded, since you're such an insider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, you know everyone. We&#8217;ll just defer to your absolute knowledge, oh mighty one. Now maybe you can tell us all why the <i>Bulletin</i> folded, since you&#8217;re such an insider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelF</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9344</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9344</guid>
		<description>Hey Sceptic, did you even read that 2001 Telegraph article to which you linked? It says Roebuck was an Australian citizen at the time of the court case, that is, &lt;b&gt;before&lt;/b&gt; he had a criminal conviction. Kind of shoots your theory down in flames. I've never had any doubt about Peter's love of his adopted country ... and your suggestion that England is not big enough for both him and Botham is just nonsense. Do you even know that he and Beefy are sworn enemies? You are making all of this up as you go along Sceptic. Fact is, you wouldn't have a clue about Peter's motives for taking out Australian citizenship, nor of his true feelings for this country. Bollocks, the lot of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sceptic, did you even read that 2001 Telegraph article to which you linked? It says Roebuck was an Australian citizen at the time of the court case, that is, <b>before</b> he had a criminal conviction. Kind of shoots your theory down in flames. I&#8217;ve never had any doubt about Peter&#8217;s love of his adopted country &#8230; and your suggestion that England is not big enough for both him and Botham is just nonsense. Do you even know that he and Beefy are sworn enemies? You are making all of this up as you go along Sceptic. Fact is, you wouldn&#8217;t have a clue about Peter&#8217;s motives for taking out Australian citizenship, nor of his true feelings for this country. Bollocks, the lot of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelF</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9343</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9343</guid>
		<description>Sceptic, unless and until you hand out patronising manners lectures equally around here, you can shove 'em where the sun don't shine. I'll not listen to another one of them, and I will push back - with interest - if you try to lay one one me.

Oh, and don't verbal me sister. I did not compare Roebuck to Hemingway. I said the short sentences in the passages were Hemingway-esque, to wit: &lt;i&gt;"in short sentences that would have done Hemingway proud, and that it is anything but â€œpurple proseâ€.&lt;/i&gt;"

And for the record Sceptic I don't agree with Roebuck and thought his "Ponting should be sacked" call was completely over the top. But it is simply not true to say that he is a bad writer with delusions of mediocrity, as you started out saying. Also for the record, I know Roebuck personally, though not well. And John Harms is a mate. And what a great Tendulkar century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sceptic, unless and until you hand out patronising manners lectures equally around here, you can shove &#8216;em where the sun don&#8217;t shine. I&#8217;ll not listen to another one of them, and I will push back - with interest - if you try to lay one one me.</p>
<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t verbal me sister. I did not compare Roebuck to Hemingway. I said the short sentences in the passages were Hemingway-esque, to wit: <i>&#8220;in short sentences that would have done Hemingway proud, and that it is anything but â€œpurple proseâ€.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>And for the record Sceptic I don&#8217;t agree with Roebuck and thought his &#8220;Ponting should be sacked&#8221; call was completely over the top. But it is simply not true to say that he is a bad writer with delusions of mediocrity, as you started out saying. Also for the record, I know Roebuck personally, though not well. And John Harms is a mate. And what a great Tendulkar century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9342</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9342</guid>
		<description>No comparison with Hemingway, Michael?
&lt;blockquote&gt;For example, you can easily make the case that it is sharply written, in short sentences that would have done Hemingway proud, and that it is anything but â€œpurple proseâ€.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Now that &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; hyperbole. And I'd remind you of your manners undertaking, too. I have not had a personal go at you at all, just a go at Roebuck. We disagree. I think he's capable of being a good writer, but in this case he's engaging in bad writing. Maybe I dislike his writing because I disagree with him. Maybe you like his writing because you agree with him - always a possibility.

I've made it very clear on previous cricket threads that I dislike the way the Australian team carries on at times. I've also made it clear that I think the Indians are little better (although the BCCI is far worse than the team, to be fair). Roebuck is simply over the top, and - as Scott Wickstein pointed out over at AGB - often seems to hate his adopted country. Now I do realise - up to a point - that he's forced to live in Oz. This is due to a combination of criminal history in the UK that means he's not treated very well around these parts, and animus from certain English cricketers (notably Botham).

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/10/20/nroe20.xml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No comparison with Hemingway, Michael?</p>
<blockquote><p>For example, you can easily make the case that it is sharply written, in short sentences that would have done Hemingway proud, and that it is anything but â€œpurple proseâ€.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now that <em>is</em> hyperbole. And I&#8217;d remind you of your manners undertaking, too. I have not had a personal go at you at all, just a go at Roebuck. We disagree. I think he&#8217;s capable of being a good writer, but in this case he&#8217;s engaging in bad writing. Maybe I dislike his writing because I disagree with him. Maybe you like his writing because you agree with him - always a possibility.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made it very clear on previous cricket threads that I dislike the way the Australian team carries on at times. I&#8217;ve also made it clear that I think the Indians are little better (although the BCCI is far worse than the team, to be fair). Roebuck is simply over the top, and - as Scott Wickstein pointed out over at AGB - often seems to hate his adopted country. Now I do realise - up to a point - that he&#8217;s forced to live in Oz. This is due to a combination of criminal history in the UK that means he&#8217;s not treated very well around these parts, and animus from certain English cricketers (notably Botham).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/10/20/nroe20.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/10/20/nroe20.xml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bring Back CL's Blog</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9341</link>
		<dc:creator>Bring Back CL's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9341</guid>
		<description>Sorry SL, but in this case Michael is correct.

you have a touch of the timbos. must be the slow bowelers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry SL, but in this case Michael is correct.</p>
<p>you have a touch of the timbos. must be the slow bowelers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9340</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9340</guid>
		<description>When it comes to cricket writers doing the Ernest Hemingway short sentences thing well, read John Harms (who taught me PE and history for two years in high school). He's no doubt given the teaching away these days, with lots of sports media and writing gigs. He's always written well in that Hemingway style. Tony discusses a great piece of his here:

http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/2008/01/johnno-the-huma.html#comments

Tony finds the short sentences irritating after a while, but I've always had a lot of time for John's writing skills, and not just because he was my teacher. In fact, IIRC, I didn't like him that much at school, but then again, I was a teenager ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to cricket writers doing the Ernest Hemingway short sentences thing well, read John Harms (who taught me PE and history for two years in high school). He&#8217;s no doubt given the teaching away these days, with lots of sports media and writing gigs. He&#8217;s always written well in that Hemingway style. Tony discusses a great piece of his here:</p>
<p><a href="http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/2008/01/johnno-the-huma.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/2008/01/johnno-the-huma.html#comments</a></p>
<p>Tony finds the short sentences irritating after a while, but I&#8217;ve always had a lot of time for John&#8217;s writing skills, and not just because he was my teacher. In fact, IIRC, I didn&#8217;t like him that much at school, but then again, I was a teenager <img src='http://skepticlawyer.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelF</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9339</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9339</guid>
		<description>Oh fer feck sake, get a grip you lot. "Lamingtons" is used for Australians, as in "as Australian as lamingtons". To suggest, as SL does in # 25 that it is somehow racist in this context is bonkers beyond words.

And then there is good old Adrien "put to the" Swords, Catallaxy's resident pedant who takes everything literally. Go back and read what I wrote Adrien - I was referring to the short sentences when I invoked Hemingway, a classic Ernest trait. I made no mention of "elegance". As for &lt;i&gt;"just a series of hackneyed sentences"&lt;/i&gt; - that is simply dribble. Like them or not, here is nothing hackneyed about those sentences. They are short, sharp and convey very precise and direct messages. Remember, these are the same sentences SL describes as "purple prose". Umm, you do what "hackneyed" means don't you Adrien?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh fer feck sake, get a grip you lot. &#8220;Lamingtons&#8221; is used for Australians, as in &#8220;as Australian as lamingtons&#8221;. To suggest, as SL does in # 25 that it is somehow racist in this context is bonkers beyond words.</p>
<p>And then there is good old Adrien &#8220;put to the&#8221; Swords, Catallaxy&#8217;s resident pedant who takes everything literally. Go back and read what I wrote Adrien - I was referring to the short sentences when I invoked Hemingway, a classic Ernest trait. I made no mention of &#8220;elegance&#8221;. As for <i>&#8220;just a series of hackneyed sentences&#8221;</i> - that is simply dribble. Like them or not, here is nothing hackneyed about those sentences. They are short, sharp and convey very precise and direct messages. Remember, these are the same sentences SL describes as &#8220;purple prose&#8221;. Umm, you do what &#8220;hackneyed&#8221; means don&#8217;t you Adrien?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienswords</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9338</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienswords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9338</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;google the guy and heâ€™s everywhere.&lt;/i&gt;

Of course he is. He's Earnest Hemingway. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>google the guy and heâ€™s everywhere.</i></p>
<p>Of course he is. He&#8217;s Earnest Hemingway. <img src='http://skepticlawyer.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienswords</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/01/4th-test-heroics-we-hope/#comment-9337</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienswords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxyfiles.com/?p=3387#comment-9337</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Lamingtonsâ€™ used in that way can mean an Aborigine â€˜acting whiteâ€™ but still letting the wheels fall off at home (by being a pisspot, usually)&lt;/i&gt;

I thought when Aborigines were on the piss they were acting white. Or Irish anyway. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lamingtonsâ€™ used in that way can mean an Aborigine â€˜acting whiteâ€™ but still letting the wheels fall off at home (by being a pisspot, usually)</i></p>
<p>I thought when Aborigines were on the piss they were acting white. Or Irish anyway. <img src='http://skepticlawyer.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
