<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You know the world has changed&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/</link>
	<description>Two lawyers and a larrikin on life, law and liberty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:33:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer &#187; Palin v Media, Round 2</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15967</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer &#187; Palin v Media, Round 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15967</guid>
		<description>[...] to Sarah Palin&#8217;s candidature was, ahem, a pretty low point and - as I pointed out in the first post I wrote on this issue - Obama has been forced to underwrite that particular bad cheque. Apart from one or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Sarah Palin&#8217;s candidature was, ahem, a pretty low point and &#8211; as I pointed out in the first post I wrote on this issue &#8211; Obama has been forced to underwrite that particular bad cheque. Apart from one or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15438</link>
		<dc:creator>John Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15438</guid>
		<description>Sinclair is spot on. Check out their jealous rage at successful women who are more highly educated than the feminists, better paid, more successful, are married and also have children.

But their recent contempt for black women turns my stomach.

I have said for ages, that the LP wymyn are less feminists than they are socialists, with all the ugliness that goes with that religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sinclair is spot on. Check out their jealous rage at successful women who are more highly educated than the feminists, better paid, more successful, are married and also have children.</p>
<p>But their recent contempt for black women turns my stomach.</p>
<p>I have said for ages, that the LP wymyn are less feminists than they are socialists, with all the ugliness that goes with that religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinclair Davidson</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15427</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinclair Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15427</guid>
		<description>SL - I&#039;m sure some lefties don&#039;t have a problem, but many do. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-camp-hits-back-at-national-enquirer-story/2008/09/04/1220121383123.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;See&lt;/a&gt; this sort of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SL &#8211; I&#8217;m sure some lefties don&#8217;t have a problem, but many do. <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/palin-camp-hits-back-at-national-enquirer-story/2008/09/04/1220121383123.html" rel="nofollow">See</a> this sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15213</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15213</guid>
		<description>Sinclair, I really do hope your wrong, or that - if you&#039;re right - the characteristic is not very widely spread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sinclair, I really do hope your wrong, or that &#8211; if you&#8217;re right &#8211; the characteristic is not very widely spread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrien</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15183</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15183</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It turns out that Palin is not a creation scientist so the skeptics can all relax. Her view on creationism in the classroom looks a lot like mine, if it comes up discuss it critically which is what science is all about anyway!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well there&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/08/29/palin-creationist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a certain disagreement&lt;/a&gt; there Rafe: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;“Teach both,” Palin said. “You know, don’t be afraid of information… I am a proponent of teaching both.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which is the latest salvo from the likes of the Discovery Institute which calls for &#039;open-minded&#039; debate meaning that a preposterous melange of theological claptrap cooked up by theocratic reactionaries should be side by side on the curricula with Darwin and Gould. 
.
That&#039;s not &#039;if it comes up discuss it&#039;.
.
Andrew Bolt of course links to another rigidly partisan blogger who writes:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Looks like Palin made an off-the-cuff statement during a debate on a hot topic, didn’t really expect the criticism she’d get, and then softened her position considerably in a follow-up interview.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If this was Obama&#039;s problem Little Green Footballs would have course said he was spinning things desperately trying to cover up his true views blah blah blah. 

Anyway in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsweek.com/id/156472/page/2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this profile&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;i&gt;Newsweek&lt;/i&gt; she&#039;s likewise on record as supporting Creationism on the curricula:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Palin said during her run that creationism should be taught alongside evolution in schools. She was baptized in an Assembly of God church, a Pentecostal denomination that believes God created the world at every step. Maria Comella, a spokeswoman for the McCain-Palin campaign, said Palin attends different churches and does not consider herself Pentecostal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The story does quite a good explication of Palin&#039;s anti-corruption activity and her opposition to Big Oil cartels as well.

Viz creationism Palin&#039;s fairly periferal to the issue. I idn&#039;t think, whatever her views personally, that putting ID in science class is a priority. I&#039;d be more worried if Huckabee&#039;d been nominated. 


.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It turns out that Palin is not a creation scientist so the skeptics can all relax. Her view on creationism in the classroom looks a lot like mine, if it comes up discuss it critically which is what science is all about anyway!</p></blockquote>
<p>Well there&#8217;s <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/08/29/palin-creationist/" rel="nofollow">a certain disagreement</a> there Rafe: </p>
<blockquote><p>“Teach both,” Palin said. “You know, don’t be afraid of information… I am a proponent of teaching both.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is the latest salvo from the likes of the Discovery Institute which calls for &#8216;open-minded&#8217; debate meaning that a preposterous melange of theological claptrap cooked up by theocratic reactionaries should be side by side on the curricula with Darwin and Gould.<br />
.<br />
That&#8217;s not &#8216;if it comes up discuss it&#8217;.<br />
.<br />
Andrew Bolt of course links to another rigidly partisan blogger who writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Looks like Palin made an off-the-cuff statement during a debate on a hot topic, didn’t really expect the criticism she’d get, and then softened her position considerably in a follow-up interview.</p></blockquote>
<p>If this was Obama&#8217;s problem Little Green Footballs would have course said he was spinning things desperately trying to cover up his true views blah blah blah. </p>
<p>Anyway in <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/156472/page/2" rel="nofollow">this profile</a> in <i>Newsweek</i> she&#8217;s likewise on record as supporting Creationism on the curricula:</p>
<blockquote><p>Palin said during her run that creationism should be taught alongside evolution in schools. She was baptized in an Assembly of God church, a Pentecostal denomination that believes God created the world at every step. Maria Comella, a spokeswoman for the McCain-Palin campaign, said Palin attends different churches and does not consider herself Pentecostal.</p></blockquote>
<p>The story does quite a good explication of Palin&#8217;s anti-corruption activity and her opposition to Big Oil cartels as well.</p>
<p>Viz creationism Palin&#8217;s fairly periferal to the issue. I idn&#8217;t think, whatever her views personally, that putting ID in science class is a priority. I&#8217;d be more worried if Huckabee&#8217;d been nominated. </p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinclair Davidson</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15170</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinclair Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15170</guid>
		<description>SL - you&#039;re being too nice about it. The left have a problem with women - especially smart, attractive women who manage life and work and who are not raving loonies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SL &#8211; you&#8217;re being too nice about it. The left have a problem with women &#8211; especially smart, attractive women who manage life and work and who are not raving loonies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Edney</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15144</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Edney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15144</guid>
		<description>It was a bizzarre rumor given that its about 100 times more likely for a 44 year old to have a baby with downs syndrome than a 17 year old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a bizzarre rumor given that its about 100 times more likely for a 44 year old to have a baby with downs syndrome than a 17 year old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15104</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just updated the post. At least some people in the USA play their politics in the sewer. Actually, no, make that &lt;i&gt;below&lt;/i&gt; the sewer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just updated the post. At least some people in the USA play their politics in the sewer. Actually, no, make that <i>below</i> the sewer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15044</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15044</guid>
		<description>It turns out that Palin is not a creation scientist so the skeptics can all relax. Her view on creationism in the classroom looks a lot like mine, if it comes up discuss it critically which is what science is all about anyway!

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/piling_onto_palin/

I don&#039;t have a dog in this fight because  both parties are committed to big government intervention but the two Rep candidates look like the most genuine people who have been up for office in living memory. 

On some reports the attention to Palin has wiped out the bounce that Obama achieved at the convention and the Democrat sleaze machine is dipping into the bottom of the barrel to get back at her.

Actually if the Democrat faithful cared about their constituency at home they would put their time and money directly where they might do some good, instead of playing politics to throw other people&#039;s money into welfare and cognate issues dear to the left. Too much to expect of course, they are too addicted to politics and power to care about consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns out that Palin is not a creation scientist so the skeptics can all relax. Her view on creationism in the classroom looks a lot like mine, if it comes up discuss it critically which is what science is all about anyway!</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/piling_onto_palin/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/piling_onto_palin/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a dog in this fight because  both parties are committed to big government intervention but the two Rep candidates look like the most genuine people who have been up for office in living memory. </p>
<p>On some reports the attention to Palin has wiped out the bounce that Obama achieved at the convention and the Democrat sleaze machine is dipping into the bottom of the barrel to get back at her.</p>
<p>Actually if the Democrat faithful cared about their constituency at home they would put their time and money directly where they might do some good, instead of playing politics to throw other people&#8217;s money into welfare and cognate issues dear to the left. Too much to expect of course, they are too addicted to politics and power to care about consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Atomou</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/30/you-know-the-world-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-15042</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Atomou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=851#comment-15042</guid>
		<description>Greenfield, vulgar language does not enhance nor improve your statement in the slightest.
It&#039;s a pity the blog doesn&#039;t have an &quot;ignore member&quot; button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greenfield, vulgar language does not enhance nor improve your statement in the slightest.<br />
It&#8217;s a pity the blog doesn&#8217;t have an &#8220;ignore member&#8221; button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
