<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Restitution Blog Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/restitution-blog-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/restitution-blog-posts/</link>
	<description>Two lawyers on law, legislation and liberty. And other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Legal Eagle</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/restitution-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-14874</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal Eagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=844#comment-14874</guid>
		<description>Oops, just lost me - don't even know about constructed objects...are they anything like constructive trusts?!? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, just lost me - don&#8217;t even know about constructed objects&#8230;are they anything like constructive trusts?!? <img src='http://skepticlawyer.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armagny</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/restitution-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-14830</link>
		<dc:creator>armagny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=844#comment-14830</guid>
		<description>I did the alsa moot yonks ago and in the contracts moot two of the three relevant cases we were picking over were trident and walton stores v maher. Good stuff!

I'm still a nerd on something like drake... but now with my studies moving into international relations I'm getting tangled more in arguments about constructed objects in security theory. Also major anorak territory...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the alsa moot yonks ago and in the contracts moot two of the three relevant cases we were picking over were trident and walton stores v maher. Good stuff!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still a nerd on something like drake&#8230; but now with my studies moving into international relations I&#8217;m getting tangled more in arguments about constructed objects in security theory. Also major anorak territory&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legal Eagle</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/restitution-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-14612</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal Eagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=844#comment-14612</guid>
		<description>My husband came in as I was writing this post, glanced over my shoulder and shouted "NERD ALERT, NERD ALERT!" Great minds think alike...

Actually I don't like Gaudron J's analysis of UE in &lt;i&gt;Trident&lt;/i&gt;. It fails to consider the "at the expense of" requirement in sufficient detail - really the unjust enrichment was at the expense of the head contractor, not the sub-contractor.

Okay, I'll stop now. I've just proven your (and my husband's) point very nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband came in as I was writing this post, glanced over my shoulder and shouted &#8220;NERD ALERT, NERD ALERT!&#8221; Great minds think alike&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually I don&#8217;t like Gaudron J&#8217;s analysis of UE in <i>Trident</i>. It fails to consider the &#8220;at the expense of&#8221; requirement in sufficient detail - really the unjust enrichment was at the expense of the head contractor, not the sub-contractor.</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll stop now. I&#8217;ve just proven your (and my husband&#8217;s) point very nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armagny</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/restitution-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-14611</link>
		<dc:creator>armagny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=844#comment-14611</guid>
		<description>Read my lips...

N-ERD.

=)

Just don't mention Trident and Mcneice (is that how it's spelt?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read my lips&#8230;</p>
<p>N-ERD.</p>
<p>=)</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t mention Trident and Mcneice (is that how it&#8217;s spelt?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://skepticlawyer.com.au/2008/08/restitution-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-14502</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticlawyer.com.au/?p=844#comment-14502</guid>
		<description>"Perhaps I need to put something out on the Restitution Discussion Group encouraging others to start blogs?"

Couldn't do any harm - A little bit of encouragement from a fellow restitution lawyer might push some into doing it. Actually, I tried syndicating the "recently added" section of the restitution site via RSS a few years ago - but it was all a new thing, and there was total lack of takeup!  Maybe the time for Restitution Blogging is here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Perhaps I need to put something out on the Restitution Discussion Group encouraging others to start blogs?&#8221;</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t do any harm - A little bit of encouragement from a fellow restitution lawyer might push some into doing it. Actually, I tried syndicating the &#8220;recently added&#8221; section of the restitution site via RSS a few years ago - but it was all a new thing, and there was total lack of takeup!  Maybe the time for Restitution Blogging is here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
