Blue Movie

By DeusExMacintosh

Prince Harry parties naked in Vegas

Pictures showing Prince Harry and a young woman naked in a Las Vegas hotel room have been published on a US website.

The two photos of the 27-year-old royal, on gossip website TMZ, were taken on a private break with friends over the weekend.

The site reported that the prince was in a group playing “strip billiards”.

St James’s Palace has confirmed the prince is in the photos but has made no further comment about the images.

The two pictures of the prince are thought to have been taken on Friday.

The website claims the pictures came after the prince, who is third in line to the throne, invited friends back to his hotel room for a private party.

It is not clear how the photos were taken, but it is presumed they were captured on a camera phone.

BBC News


  1. TerjeP
    Posted August 24, 2012 at 5:42 am | Permalink

    I’m shocked!! Shocked and appalled!!

  2. Posted August 24, 2012 at 7:09 am | Permalink

    Down With This Sort Of Thing!

  3. kvd
    Posted August 24, 2012 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    LE, I hit your link, but got a page saying “Apologies, but we were unable to find what you were looking for. Perhaps scratching will help.”

    Either I need new glasses, or you need a revised link 😉

  4. Mel
    Posted August 24, 2012 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    Divine inspiration, or the devil made me do it?

  5. Posted August 24, 2012 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    But the top-selling tabloid defied the request and published the pictures – already widely seen on the internet – in Friday’s paper, saying in a statement that its readers had a “right to see them.”

    Where do I go to make my argument for being given less rights?! [Although, credit where it’s due. Not a bad figure… 😉 ]

    The Beeb has more on The Sun’s decision here.

  6. Davoh
    Posted August 26, 2012 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    heh, heh heh. Ah the Machiavellian machinations of ‘high level’ “politics”.

    Theory – what if Harry, third son and little chance at the “throne” in the near future – is angling toward the “popular” vote if, perhaps, sometime in the future, England accepts “Presidential” (i.e. meeja driven) democracy? Just a thought.

  7. Davoh
    Posted August 26, 2012 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    * third son after Charles.

  8. Posted August 27, 2012 at 2:53 am | Permalink

    Well if you think in terms of the Declaration of Abroath, Scotland already has a “presidential” democracy as the Scottish people have essentially reserved the right to sack their Monarchs if not up to snuff. (And unfortunately accidents do happen. Have you never seen King Ralph?)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *